Posts tagged governance.
Beyond Zero answers what the machine decides. It does not answer who said it could.
Google's Beyond Zero moves the trust boundary from the application to the individual action and puts a reasoning layer in the access path. The objection that landed on Hacker News, that a non-deterministic evaluator does not belong there, is aimed one layer too low. The gap is not determinism. It is legitimacy: nothing establishes that a given system has the standing to act in your environment, against your traffic, under your conditions. Vendor-asserted accuracy is not evidence.
Why Autonomous Enforcement Must Earn Authority
The technology to defend networks autonomously exists. The legitimacy to deploy it does not. Introducing earned autonomy: a governance framework where defensive authority is demonstrated before granted, scoped per abuse class, and continuously re-earned or revoked.
Earned Autonomy: The Paper
Machines attack at machine speed. Humans defend at human speed. The technology to close this gap exists - the governance doesn't. A framework for when machines should be permitted to act without human approval.
Validating Inline Enforcement with XDP: IBSR and the Path to Earned Autonomy
Inline enforcement operates at machine speed, but trust cannot. IBSR is a validation step: using XDP to observe real traffic, simulate enforcement, and generate evidence before any blocking is enabled.
Earned Autonomy: A Governance Framework for Autonomous Network Defence
Autonomous mitigations already act at machine speed - but we still have no legitimate framework for granting them authority over novel threats.
On Earned Autonomy: When Should Machines Defend Networks Without Asking?
Machines attack at machine speed. Humans defend at human speed. We propose a governance framework for closing that gap, not through blind trust but through demonstrated competence.
